When renting out a furnished unit am I allowed to collect a deposit of less than one’s month’s rent for the furniture, in addition to last month’s rent?
Under the Residential Tenancies Act a landlord is allowed to collect the last months rent as a security deposit. Landlords cannot charge damage deposits, even where they are refundable.
I’ve purchased two properties, one is a full residence the other seasonal. I’ve asked for and received a damage deposit. Is it illegal to ask for a damage deposit?
Under the Residential Tenancies Act it is illegal to collect a damage deposit, you can only ask for the last month’s rent deposit. In the case of a tenancy that is exempt from this Act we are not aware of any laws regarding this issue. As for what constitutes a vacation home or resort, the section of the Residential Tenancies Act that lists the exemptions is section 5. This section refers to vacation homes, resorts, hotels, motels, tourist camps, cottages, etc. as living accommodation intended to be provided to the travelling or vacationing public or occupied for a seasonal or temporary period.
I have a tenant moving July 31st, but we have had some bad experiences with tenants leaving a mess behind. Could I give the money back on the 31st when we do the final inspection and get the keys?
There is nothing wrong with giving the deposit back to the tenant on the 31st when they’re moving out. However, the deposit is only supposed to be used for the rent for the last month, so even if you find any damages, you would still have to return the deposit to them.
I don’t understand the paragraph on your Rental Application that deals with rent deposits, could you please explain it? If the tenant does not move in can the landlord still hold the last month’s rent?
Perhaps it would be helpful if I explained the wording of our rental application in the context of contract law in general, rather than only specifically as it relates to a rental agreement. In Ontario, according to the Residential Tenancies Act, a “tenancy agreement” means a written, oral or implied agreement between a tenant and a landlord for occupancy of a rental unit and includes a licence to occupy a rental unit.” For there to be any kind of contract, there has to exist an offer, acceptance, AND consideration paid in order to “seal the deal,” so to speak. Because the landlord is in a somewhat vulnerable position when offering their rental premises to multiple applicants, it is the usual and accepted practice of asking for a rental deposit (usually part or all of the last month’s rent) from an applicant when the application is made as a way to screen out applicants who are not really serious about moving into the unit if they are accepted. If a landlord is sorting through, for example, three applications for the same unit, they would ask for three deposits along with the three corresponding rental applications. Once a selection has been made, the landlord would return the deposit money to the unsuccessful applicants when they are told they were not successful. The landlord would keep the remaining deposit and apply it to the last month’s rent account for the new tenant. At this point, it is usual (but not required) for the landlord to enter into a lease or written tenancy agreement. Decisions made both at the Landlord and Tenant Board, and Divisional Court generally support a landlord’s position that if the tenant is not taking the unit after being accepted and paying something to the landlord, as long as the landlord is making reasonable efforts to re-rent the unit (Section 16- mitigating losses), then the (usually) last month’s rent amount may be used on a daily rent basis until the unit is re-rented, and the landlord must then return the balance to the tenant, and deduct any reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred in the re-rental of the unit. However, landlords cannot keep this amount outright as a blanket penalty or fee. In short, this clause appears in some form or other in most residential tenancies as a deterrent against applicants entering into contracts that they have no intention of fulfilling. If it were otherwise, then landlords would likely have to have several months’ worth of rent in reserve to allow for tenants changing their minds on a whim and forcing the landlord into long periods of time where they get no rental income between tenants.